首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of solution behaviour for three models of pressure-dependent plasticity: A simple analytical example
【2h】

Comparison of solution behaviour for three models of pressure-dependent plasticity: A simple analytical example

机译:三种与压力相关的可塑性模型的溶液行为比较:一个简单的分析示例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The main objective of the present paper is to compare, by means of a problem permitting a closed-form solution, qualitative behaviour of solutions based on three models of pressure-dependent plasticity, the coaxial model, the double-shearing model, and the double-slip and rotation model. The constitutive equations of each model reduce to classical metal plasticity at specific values of input parameters. Nevertheless, the solution behaviour essentially depends on the model chosen, independently of how close the input parameters are to these specific values. In particular, such features of the solutions as non-uniqueness, non-existence and singularity are emphasized. It is concluded that the double-slip and rotation model only retains all features inherent to classical plasticity.
机译:本文的主要目的是通过允许闭合形式解的问题,比较基于压力依赖塑性的三种模型,同轴模型,双剪切模型和双模型的溶液的定性行为。滑移和旋转模型。在输入参数的特定值下,每个模型的本构方程都还原为经典的金属可塑性。尽管如此,求解行为本质上取决于选择的模型,而与输入参数与这些特定值的接近程度无关。特别地,强调解决方案的诸如非唯一性,不存在和奇异性的特征。结论是,双滑移和旋转模型仅保留了经典可塑性固有的所有特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号